Before Day 7: Set your tools
- Timing sheet with the 17-20-23 split and a 2-minute reserve per passage.
- Error log with five columns: Question ID, Type, Error reason, Proof phrase, Fix action.
- Answer keys with rationales that show a short proof phrase and why distractors fail.
- Confidence codes to mark each answer: H high, M medium, L low.
- Drill bank of 10 to 15 short tasks grouped by type: headings, True False Not Given, matching names, sentence completion.
Keep everything in one folder. The goal is zero decision making during the week.
Day 7: Baseline mock and first numbers
Objective: capture a clean baseline under exam timing.
- Run a full Reading mock with the 17-20-23 split. No pausing.
- Mark immediately using the key. For each wrong item, copy a proof phrase that justifies the correct answer.
- Tag error reasons precisely: locate issue, inference gap, distractor trap, vocabulary, time pressure.
- Log four metrics:
- Locate time average
- Low-confidence count (L)
- Accuracy by type
- Distractor resilience count
Targets: do not chase a score today. Your job is to diagnose patterns and pick two error types for repair.
Common pitfalls to note today
- Matching a keyword without checking paragraph function
- Reading options before reading the relevant lines
- Spending more than 60 seconds stuck on one item
Day 6: Autopsy and fix plan
Objective: turn errors into actions.
- Sort the log by type. Choose the worst two categories.
- Write one fix action per category. Examples:
- Headings: read first and last lines, name the function in 5 words such as contrast or result, then pick.
- T F NG: track polarity and quantifiers like all, most, a minority.
- Matching names: build a quick table of who did what before answering.
- Run two short drills from your bank, 10 to 12 items total.
- Proof-phrase copy: for every reviewed item, write the 3 to 7 words that anchor the answer.
Targets: finish with a written mini playbook for the two weak types. Keep it to six bullet points or fewer.
Day 5: One-minute locate and distractor lab
Objective: speed up locating while hardening against traps.
- One-minute locate: pick 10 items across passages. For each, find the paragraph with the evidence within 60 seconds. Do not answer, only locate. Mark pass or fail and record the time.
- Distractor lab: collect three wrong options that fooled you yesterday. Write the tiny break detail: scope too wide, time reference off, negative vs positive, cause vs correlation.
- Micro set rehearsal: 8 to 10 completion items to practice precision on word forms and hyphenation.
Targets: reduce average locate time by 10 to 15 seconds compared to Day 7. Cut repeated distractor errors of the same kind.
Day 4: Mixed rehearsal with confidence sweep
Objective: simulate switching between types while protecting momentum.
- Run a 30-minute mixed set that samples headings, T F NG, matching names, and completion. Keep the 60-second move-on rule.
- Confidence sweep: at minute 28, revisit only L-tagged items. Change answers only if you can add a new proof phrase.
- Short reflection: write two sentences on what protected your focus and what disrupted it.
Targets: fewer than 6 L-tagged answers in the mixed set. At least 80 percent of changed answers must be supported by a new proof phrase.
Day 3: Second full mock to confirm fixes
Objective: prove improvement under full conditions.
- Run full mock B with the same environment and timing split.
- Mark and compare to Day 7 using the same four metrics.
- Escalate or recycle
- If locate time is under 40 seconds and L count is halved, move to maintenance drills.
- If one type still lags, schedule that type again on Day 2.
Targets: improvement in at least three of the four metrics. If total correct rises but L count stays high, your accuracy is fragile. Fix that before test day.
Day 2: Light consolidation and routine lock
Objective: solidify habits and remove noise.
- Five-minute routine script: write step-by-step actions for the section. Include how you preview, when you mark confidence, and how you spend the final 2 minutes.
- Two short drills only for the weakest type. Stop while still fresh.
- Vocabulary signals pass: scan your notes for logical connectors such as however, consequently, despite and quantifiers such as several, many, a minority. These often decide T F NG and completion precision.
- Environment rehearsal: sit for 20 minutes in the same posture and lighting you will use on exam day. Practice page turning and bubbling or digital selection rhythm.
Targets: finish with a calm, repeatable sequence you can recite without notes.
Day 1: Taper, micro-review, sleep
Objective: protect energy and keep your reading brain sharp without stress.
- Micro set of 6 to 8 items in your weakest type. Treat it as a warm up, not a test.
- Proof-phrase flashcards: review 10 items where the phrase was especially instructive.
- Bag check: ID, pens or pencils, watch if allowed, water, snack plan for breaks.
- Sleep routine: cut screens early, review your routine script once, then stop.
Targets: arrive on test day with a clear head, no last-minute panic drilling.
Exact techniques to keep
- 17-20-23 split with a 2-minute reserve inside each block.
- Locate then read deeply. Find the paragraph before investing attention.
- Proof first, answer second. If you cannot point to a line, you are guessing.
- Confidence codes H M L on the page. Use them to guide the final sweep.
- Move-on rule at 60 seconds. Guess by elimination, mark L, and protect the next items.
Two mini examples that show how to think
Example 1: True, False, Not Given
Statement: The museum opens at 8 a.m. on weekdays.
Text: The museum opens at 9 a.m. from Monday to Friday.
Reasoning: The statement contradicts opening time.
Answer: False.
Proof phrase: “opens at 9 a.m. from Monday to Friday.”
Example 2: Matching headings
Paragraph D outlines a method, reports a surprising result, then states a limitation. Two headings feel close: New method and Unexpected outcome.
Reasoning: The central function is method description that leads to a result, but the paragraph’s key message is the limitation that constrains the result.
Answer: Heading that signals limits or constraints.
Proof phrase: “however, this approach cannot be applied when…”
Write this logic briefly in your log to prevent the same trap later.
Mini case: Rafi’s exam-week run
Day 7 score was 26 correct with average locate time 55 seconds and 12 L tags. He identified headings and T F NG as weak types. On Day 6 he wrote two fix actions: function labeling for headings and quantifier tracking for T F NG. After one-minute locate and a distractor lab on Day 5, his locate time fell to 41 seconds. On Day 3 he scored 34 correct with 5 L tags and only two distractor mistakes. Day 2 routine lock reduced stress, and Day 1 taper kept him fresh. The improvement came from proof-first reading, not from reading faster.
Troubleshooting guide
- I always overrun on Passage 3. Push the move-on rule harder in Passage 2 so you start Passage 3 with a clean buffer.
- Headings keep beating me. Read first and last lines, name the paragraph function in 5 words, then compare functions to headings. Do not match keywords.
- I change correct answers during the sweep. Only switch if you can write a new proof phrase. If not, trust the first choice.
- I panic when options look similar. Search for the smallest mismatch: time, scope, polarity, cause versus correlation. One tiny break usually exists.
- Vocabulary gaps block me. Ignore rare words unless they are part of the logic signal. Focus on connectors and quantifiers.
Quick checklist for each practice block
Do
- Set the timer for the exact block.
- Mark confidence immediately after answering.
- Copy proof phrases during review.
- Update the error log with one fix action.
Avoid
- Heavy annotation that hides the one line that matters.
- Answering from outside knowledge.
- Spending more than 60 seconds stuck on one item.
- Skipping the final 2-minute confidence sweep.
Glossary
- Proof phrase: the small chunk of text that justifies an answer.
- Locate time: average seconds to find the right paragraph before deep reading.
- Distractor: a tempting wrong option that repeats keywords but flips meaning or scope.
- Polarity: positive vs negative wording that can reverse truth value.
- Function reading: identifying what a paragraph does, such as contrast, cause, or limitation.
Your action plan now
- Assemble the tools and print the timing sheet and error log.
- Start Day 7 today with a clean mock and honest numbers.
- Follow each day’s objective and target without adding extra work.
- On Day 3 compare metrics, not feelings, and adjust only the weakest type.
- Taper on Day 1 and trust your routine.
Use this kit to remove randomness from Reading. When every answer points to a line, every change is backed by a proof phrase, and every day has a single objective, your score becomes predictable. That is how you arrive on exam day ready to convert calm focus into marks.